<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Apples</title>
	<atom:link href="http://goldclone.org/2008/10/18/bad-apples/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://goldclone.org/2008/10/18/bad-apples/</link>
	<description>Vegard's infinite wisdom</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:33:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vegard</title>
		<link>http://goldclone.org/2008/10/18/bad-apples/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Vegard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldclone.org/?p=364#comment-17</guid>
		<description>There is no difference in those ports except the design.
Display port is a small DVI port (the same signals).
HDMI is the same signals as DVI + sound.
So why have 2 mini ports for the same signal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no difference in those ports except the design.<br />
Display port is a small DVI port (the same signals).<br />
HDMI is the same signals as DVI + sound.<br />
So why have 2 mini ports for the same signal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basso</title>
		<link>http://goldclone.org/2008/10/18/bad-apples/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Basso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 00:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldclone.org/?p=364#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Well HDMI = Home theater, nothing else.
And does not have enough bandwith to dongle more screens through 1 cable.

DVI: Devil Video Interport! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well HDMI = Home theater, nothing else.<br />
And does not have enough bandwith to dongle more screens through 1 cable.</p>
<p>DVI: Devil Video Interport! <img src='http://goldclone.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vegard</title>
		<link>http://goldclone.org/2008/10/18/bad-apples/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Vegard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 08:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldclone.org/?p=364#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I agree, but why not use hdmi?
It has been adapted by many pc laptop makers, and it is available on most screens, projectors and tvs (remember that hdmi and dvi is the same signal, just with and without sound). The use of another mini dvi port does only mean more adapters. In the end making dvi the new S-video with hundreds of different pin configurations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, but why not use hdmi?<br />
It has been adapted by many pc laptop makers, and it is available on most screens, projectors and tvs (remember that hdmi and dvi is the same signal, just with and without sound). The use of another mini dvi port does only mean more adapters. In the end making dvi the new S-video with hundreds of different pin configurations</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Basso</title>
		<link>http://goldclone.org/2008/10/18/bad-apples/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Basso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 19:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldclone.org/?p=364#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Well i agree.
But the displayport is the coming-gen output. VGA is 200 years old, DVI is too bulky, and HDMI is a Home Theather cable not belonging to to the PC world.

According to HP at a seminar, you can dongle several screens with displayport through 1 output on the PC, thus not needing several graphiccards/outputs for multiscreen setups.

But Im never going to get an Appleish computah!

Cheers
Super Basso of Doom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well i agree.<br />
But the displayport is the coming-gen output. VGA is 200 years old, DVI is too bulky, and HDMI is a Home Theather cable not belonging to to the PC world.</p>
<p>According to HP at a seminar, you can dongle several screens with displayport through 1 output on the PC, thus not needing several graphiccards/outputs for multiscreen setups.</p>
<p>But Im never going to get an Appleish computah!</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Super Basso of Doom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vegard</title>
		<link>http://goldclone.org/2008/10/18/bad-apples/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Vegard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 17:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldclone.org/?p=364#comment-4</guid>
		<description>The previus 17&quot; Macbook Pro used to have 3 usb ports.
It had an built-in dvi port, and a dvi to vga adapter was included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The previus 17&#8243; Macbook Pro used to have 3 usb ports.<br />
It had an built-in dvi port, and a dvi to vga adapter was included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristian</title>
		<link>http://goldclone.org/2008/10/18/bad-apples/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 14:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://goldclone.org/?p=364#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Well none of these issues are new, 2 USB ports, no memory card reader and the funky mac only solutions for external screens are exactly the same on the old macbooks, and the old ibooks. The 4gb ram is quite strange as their desktops support alot more. As a revision this is a minor one, sure the new large touchpad without a button and the multigestures is nice, but it is mostly design. If you want to use it as a main computer maybe the 24 inch screen thingy with more usb ports can be a good choice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well none of these issues are new, 2 USB ports, no memory card reader and the funky mac only solutions for external screens are exactly the same on the old macbooks, and the old ibooks. The 4gb ram is quite strange as their desktops support alot more. As a revision this is a minor one, sure the new large touchpad without a button and the multigestures is nice, but it is mostly design. If you want to use it as a main computer maybe the 24 inch screen thingy with more usb ports can be a good choice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
